AI 提示詞: 軟體開發

建構軟體不只是寫程式碼——而是做出累積數月甚至數年的決策。這些提示詞幫助您設計更好的架構、撰寫有意義的測試,並進行真正能發現問題的程式碼審查。已在ChatGPT、Gemini和Claude上測試,讓您知道哪個模型最擅長系統思考。

最近測試日期 Feb 15, 2026 · 模型: GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok 2
您想做的事 提示詞 最適合
設計專案的系統架構 架構顧問 Claude
進行徹底的自動程式碼審查 程式碼審查Pro Claude
建構專案的測試策略 測試策略 ChatGPT
設計高效的資料庫架構 資料庫設計 Gemini
設定CI/CD和部署管線 DevOps管線 ChatGPT
識別和排列技術債務的優先順序 技術債務追蹤 Claude

架構顧問

設計專案的系統架構

Help me design the architecture for a software project.

Project: [describe what you're building]
Scale: [expected users, data volume, growth rate]
Team size: [number of developers]
Tech constraints: [required technologies, cloud provider, existing systems]
Budget: [infrastructure budget range]
Timeline: [when does this need to ship]

Design:
1. High-level architecture diagram described in detail (services, databases, APIs)
2. Technology stack recommendation with reasoning for each choice
3. Data model overview with key entities and relationships
4. API design: RESTful vs. GraphQL vs. gRPC with justification
5. Scaling strategy: what changes when you go from 100 to 10,000 to 1M users
6. The top 3 architectural risks and how to mitigate them early

最適合: CLAUDE

Claude提供包含誠實取捨分析的最精細的架構建議。不是推薦無論誰建構都「最好」的工具,而是將團隊規模和技能水平納入技術選擇考量。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

在提示詞中包含團隊的現有專長。向兩個初級開發者的團隊推薦微服務架構是失敗的處方。AI應該為您的團隊而非虛擬的完美團隊做設計。

程式碼審查Pro

進行徹底的自動程式碼審查

Review this code as if you were a senior developer on my team.

[Paste the code or pull request diff]

Context: [what this code does and why it was written]
Framework: [framework and version]
Team standards: [style guide, naming conventions, patterns used]
Critical areas: [security, performance, or maintainability priorities]

Review and provide:
1. Critical issues: bugs, security vulnerabilities, or data loss risks
2. Major improvements: design patterns, abstraction opportunities, performance gains
3. Minor suggestions: naming, readability, style consistency
4. Questions I'd ask in a PR review (things that need clarification from the author)
5. Test coverage gaps: what tests are missing for this code
6. An overall assessment: ship it, needs minor fixes, or needs significant rework

最適合: CLAUDE

Claude進行平衡重大問題和建設性建議的最徹底的程式碼審查。按嚴重度分類回饋,不只指出問題還提供可執行的修復。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

包含PR描述和變更的原因。AI理解意圖時程式碼品質的審查會好得多。沒有上下文的話,它可能建議重構那些故意這樣寫的程式碼。

測試策略

建構專案的測試策略

Help me build a testing strategy for my project.

Project type: [web app / mobile app / API / library / CLI tool]
Stack: [languages, frameworks, testing tools already in use]
Current test coverage: [percentage or 'none']
Team testing culture: [strong / weak / nonexistent]
Most critical features: [what absolutely cannot break]
CI/CD: [what you use for continuous integration]

Design:
1. A testing pyramid specific to my stack (unit, integration, e2e ratios)
2. What to test first: prioritized list of critical paths
3. Testing patterns and conventions to adopt (arrange-act-assert, fixtures, mocks)
4. 5 example test cases for my most critical feature
5. CI pipeline integration: how to run tests automatically
6. A realistic roadmap to go from current coverage to 80%+ in 30 days

最適合: CHATGPT

ChatGPT產生包含框架特定範例的最實用的測試策略。測試案例可複製貼上,也了解GitHub Actions、GitLab CI等CI/CD平台的設定。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

從重要使用者路徑的整合測試開始,而非工具函式的單元測試。整合測試能捕捉到實際會破壞產品的錯誤。單元測試可以後來再加。

資料庫設計

設計高效的資料庫架構

Help me design a database schema for my application.

Application: [describe what the app does]
Data types: [list the main types of data you'll store]
Relationships: [describe how data connects: users have posts, orders have items, etc.]
Query patterns: [the most common reads and writes]
Scale: [expected data volume and growth rate]
Database: [PostgreSQL / MySQL / MongoDB / undecided]

Design:
1. Complete schema with tables, columns, types, and constraints
2. Primary and foreign key relationships with reasoning
3. Indexes for your most common query patterns
4. Normalization assessment: where to normalize vs. denormalize for performance
5. Migration strategy: how to evolve this schema as requirements change
6. Common query examples for the top 5 operations your app will perform

最適合: GEMINI

Gemini產生包含徹底索引建議的最整齊的資料庫架構。正規化決策合理,並提供考慮零停機部署的遷移策略。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

在設計架構前,先列出前5個最常用的查詢。架構設計不只要根據數據怎麼寫,還要根據怎麼讀。AI知道存取模式後能設計出更好的索引和反正規化。

DevOps管線

設定CI/CD和部署管線

Help me set up a CI/CD pipeline for my project.

Project type: [web app / API / mobile / monorepo]
Stack: [languages, frameworks, build tools]
Source control: [GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket]
Deploy target: [AWS / GCP / Azure / Vercel / Railway / Docker]
Current deployment: [manual / some automation / none]
Team size: [number of developers]

Build:
1. A complete CI pipeline configuration file (YAML) for my platform
2. Build, test, lint, and security scan stages with specific commands
3. Branch strategy: main, develop, feature branches with merge rules
4. Deployment strategy: blue-green, rolling, or canary with justification
5. Environment management: dev, staging, production configuration
6. Rollback procedure: how to revert a bad deployment in under 5 minutes

最適合: CHATGPT

ChatGPT產生最準確的特定平台CI/CD設定檔。YAML設定只需最少修改就能運作,了解GitHub Actions快取和成品管理等平台特定的細節。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

包含目前的部署流程,即使是「SSH到伺服器跑git pull」。AI知道起點後能建議漸進式改善而非完全翻新,從而建構更好的管線。

技術債務追蹤

識別和排列技術債務的優先順序

Help me assess and prioritize the technical debt in my project.

Project age: [how long it's been in development]
Team size: [developers working on it]
Known pain points: [parts of the codebase everyone avoids]
Recent incidents: [bugs or outages caused by old code]
Upcoming features: [what you need to build next]
Current tech stack: [languages, frameworks, versions]

Provide:
1. A technical debt assessment framework: categories and severity levels
2. Audit checklist: questions to identify hidden debt across the codebase
3. A prioritization matrix: impact vs. effort for each debt category
4. A 'pay down' plan: how to allocate 20% of sprint capacity to debt reduction
5. Quick wins: debt that can be fixed in under a day with high impact
6. How to communicate tech debt to non-technical stakeholders (with ROI framing)

最適合: CLAUDE

Claude提供包含誠實優先排序的最策略性技術債務評估。不只列出問題,還根據未來路線圖幫助判斷哪些債務值得修復、哪些應該共存。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

包含未來的功能路線圖。技術債務應該根據是否阻擋未來工作來排定優先順序。重構永遠不會再碰的程式碼雖然讓人滿意,但浪費了本該用於實際造成減速的債務的時間。

模型比較

基於實際測試結果 — 非假設推測。 查看測試方法

G

Gemini

Best for database design and schema optimization. Produces well-indexed, scalable schemas with clear migration strategies. Less opinionated about architectural trade-offs than Claude.

結果來源: Gemini 2.0 Flash · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026
C

ChatGPT

Best for CI/CD pipelines and testing strategies. Generates accurate platform-specific configuration files and framework-aware test cases. Can suggest over-engineered solutions for simple projects.

結果來源: GPT-4o · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026
C

Claude

Best for architecture decisions and code reviews. Provides the most honest trade-off analysis and considers team capability in its recommendations. Its tech debt assessments are the most strategically useful.

結果來源: Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026
G

Grok

Offers opinionated and practical architecture advice that cuts through over-engineering. Good at identifying pragmatic solutions for real-world development, but less focused on enterprise patterns and scalability planning than Claude.

結果來源: Grok 2 · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026

在 NailedIt 中試試

將上方的提示詞貼到 NailedIt,並排比較各模型的回應。

進階技巧

1

Design for your team, not for a blog post. The best architecture is the one your team can build and maintain. Microservices for a 2-person team or Kubernetes for 100 users is over-engineering. Tell AI your team size and skill level so it recommends appropriately.

2

Tests are an investment, not a tax. Every hour spent writing good tests saves 3-5 hours of debugging later. Start with integration tests for critical user paths rather than chasing 100% unit test coverage on utility functions.

3

Document decisions, not just code. Comments explain what code does. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) explain WHY you chose this approach. When future developers ask 'why is it built this way?' the ADR answers them without a meeting.