完成更多事情的最快方式不是更努力工作,而是改善流程。這些提示詞幫助您繪製工作流程、找出瓶頸,並重新設計工作方式。已在ChatGPT、Gemini和Claude上測試,讓您知道哪個模型最擅長系統思考。
| 您想做的事 | 最適合 |
|---|---|
| 識別和消除工作流程瓶頸 | Claude |
| 視覺化繪製工作流程 | ChatGPT |
| 減少不必要的會議 | Claude |
| 改善團隊之間的交接 | Gemini |
| 發現使用工具的重複和浪費 | ChatGPT |
| 建立標準作業程序 | Gemini |
提示詞
識別和消除工作流程瓶頸
Here's my current workflow for [process name]: [Describe each step, who does it, and how long it takes] The pain points I notice: [list frustrations] Deadline pressure: [how often things are late] Analyze this workflow and give me: 1. The single biggest bottleneck and why it's slowing everything down 2. Three process changes to eliminate or reduce it 3. Which steps can run in parallel instead of sequentially 4. A redesigned workflow with estimated time savings 5. Metrics to track so I know the optimization is working
最適合: CLAUDE
Claude最擅長系統思考,能識別根本原因而非表面症狀。即使瓶頸由多個因素引起,也能進行結構性分析。
已測試 Feb 15, 2026
進階技巧
在描述瓶頸時加入「等待時間在哪裡發生」。等待時間是瓶頸最明確的指標,AI能提出最有效的解決方案。
視覺化繪製工作流程
I need to document this process that currently exists only in people's heads: Process: [name and purpose] People involved: [roles] Tools used: [software/apps] Frequency: [how often this process runs] Create: 1. A step-by-step process document with clear ownership at each step 2. Decision points (if X, then do Y; if Z, then do W) 3. A simple flowchart in text/ASCII format 4. Time estimates for each step 5. The "tribal knowledge" questions I should ask the team to fill gaps 6. A checklist version someone new could follow on day one
最適合: CHATGPT
Gemini能建立最結構化的流程圖,以流程圖格式清晰表達。輸入、輸出和決策點都能完整涵蓋。
已測試 Feb 15, 2026
進階技巧
先描述「目前的流程」而非「理想的流程」。先準確掌握現狀再優化,否則會解決不存在的問題。
減少不必要的會議
Here are the recurring meetings on my team's calendar: [List each meeting: name, frequency, duration, attendees, stated purpose] Team size: [number] Primary communication tools: [Slack, email, etc.] For each meeting, tell me: 1. Keep, shorten, merge, or kill — with specific reasoning 2. What async alternative could replace it (and exact format) 3. If kept: optimal duration, frequency, and attendee list 4. A meeting-free block schedule for deep work 5. Templates for async standups and status updates 6. How to handle the political fallout of canceling someone's meeting
最適合: CLAUDE
ChatGPT最善於實用地評估會議的必要性,並具體建議替代方案(非同步溝通、站立更新等)。
已測試 Feb 15, 2026
進階技巧
列出一週的所有會議,並記錄每場會議的決議。沒有產生決議的會議是可以用郵件替代的候選者。
改善團隊之間的交接
Work gets stuck or lost when it moves between these stages/people: From [person/team A] to [person/team B]: - What's handed off: [description] - Current method: [email, Slack, shared doc, etc.] - What goes wrong: [common failures] Design a handoff system that includes: 1. A standardized handoff template with required fields 2. A checklist the sender completes before passing work 3. An acceptance criteria the receiver checks 4. Notification rules (who gets pinged, when, how) 5. An escalation path when handoffs stall 6. A weekly metric to track handoff quality
最適合: GEMINI
Claude最善於識別溝通落差,並建立防止團隊間「漏接」的檢查清單和模板。
已測試 Feb 15, 2026
進階技巧
包含最近交接出問題的具體案例。比起抽象描述,AI能從實際失敗案例中建構更具體有效的解決方案。
發現使用工具的重複和浪費
Here are all the tools/apps my team uses: [List each tool: name, purpose, cost/month, who uses it, how often] Pain points: [what's frustrating about current tools] Budget: [monthly tool budget] Team size: [number] Give me: 1. Overlap analysis — which tools do the same thing 2. Consolidation recommendations (fewer tools, same capabilities) 3. Missing tools — gaps that are costing you time 4. A migration plan for switching tools with minimal disruption 5. Cost comparison: current stack vs. optimized stack 6. Integration opportunities between remaining tools
最適合: CHATGPT
ChatGPT對SaaS工具有最廣泛的知識,能準確指出功能重複。整合建議也很具體且可執行。
已測試 Feb 15, 2026
進階技巧
不只列出團隊共用的工具,也要包括個人訂閱的工具。影子IT比想像中多,且是重複的主要原因。
建立標準作業程序
I need an SOP for: [process name] Who performs this: [role/title] Frequency: [how often] Current documentation: [none / outdated doc / tribal knowledge] Risk if done wrong: [consequences of errors] Build a complete SOP that includes: 1. Purpose and scope (when to use this SOP) 2. Prerequisites and required access/tools 3. Step-by-step instructions with screenshots placeholders 4. Common mistakes and how to avoid them 5. Troubleshooting section for the top 5 failure scenarios 6. Version history table and review schedule
最適合: GEMINI
Gemini能建立最清晰和結構化的SOP,每個步驟的細節粒度適當。即使新進人員也能立即理解的格式。
已測試 Feb 15, 2026
進階技巧
建立SOP後,讓實際不了解該流程的人測試。自己寫時往往會省略「隱性知識」。
基於實際測試結果 — 非假設推測。 查看測試方法
Gemini
Best for structured documentation and templates. Produces clean, well-formatted SOPs and process docs that work immediately in Google Workspace without reformatting.
結果來源: Gemini 2.0 Flash · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026ChatGPT
Best for tool comparisons and process documentation. Knows specific SaaS features and pricing. Tends to suggest adding more tools — push it to consolidate instead.
結果來源: GPT-4o · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026Claude
Best for systems analysis and finding hidden bottlenecks. Thinks about workflows holistically and considers human dynamics, not just process steps.
結果來源: Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026Grok
Strongest at cutting through bureaucratic bloat and identifying processes that exist for no good reason. Delivers blunt, actionable recommendations for streamlining workflows. Too informal for polished corporate SOPs and formal process documentation.
結果來源: Grok 2 · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026Map the actual process, not the ideal one. Document how work really flows today — including the workarounds and shortcuts. You can't optimize a process you haven't honestly described.
Measure before and after, or it didn't happen. Ask AI to define 2-3 metrics before you change anything. Without a baseline, you can't prove the optimization worked and leadership won't fund the next one.
Optimize the constraint, ignore everything else. Improving a step that isn't the bottleneck makes zero difference to overall throughput. Find the single slowest step first and fix only that.