AI 프롬프트: 워크플로우 최적화

더 많은 일을 해내는 가장 빠른 방법은 더 열심히 일하는 것이 아니라 프로세스를 개선하는 것입니다. 이 프롬프트들은 워크플로우를 분석하고, 병목 현상을 찾으며, 업무 흐름을 재설계하는 데 도움을 줍니다. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude에서 테스트되어 시스템 사고에 가장 뛰어난 모델을 알 수 있습니다.

마지막 테스트 날짜 Feb 15, 2026 · 모델: GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok 2
하고 싶은 것 프롬프트 최적 용도
Identify workflow bottlenecks Bottleneck Buster Claude
Document and visualize workflows 프로세스 매퍼 ChatGPT
Reduce unnecessary meetings Meeting Slasher Claude
Fix broken team handoffs Handoff Healer Gemini
Optimize your software tool stack Tool Stack Auditor ChatGPT
표준 운영 절차 작성하기 SOP Builder Gemini

Bottleneck Buster

Identify workflow bottlenecks

Here's my current workflow for [process name]:

[Describe each step, who does it, and how long it takes]

The pain points I notice: [list frustrations]
Deadline pressure: [how often things are late]

Analyze this workflow and give me:
1. The single biggest bottleneck and why it's slowing everything down
2. Three process changes to eliminate or reduce it
3. Which steps can run in parallel instead of sequentially
4. A redesigned workflow with estimated time savings
5. Metrics to track so I know the optimization is working

최적 용도: CLAUDE

Claude is best at systems thinking and identifies non-obvious dependencies between steps. It asks the right follow-up questions about why bottlenecks exist rather than just suggesting surface-level fixes.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Include handoff points — where work moves from one person or tool to another. That's where 80% of delays hide, and AI can't find them if you only describe what happens, not who passes what to whom.

프로세스 매퍼

Document and visualize workflows

I need to document this process that currently exists only in people's heads:

Process: [name and purpose]
People involved: [roles]
Tools used: [software/apps]
Frequency: [how often this process runs]

Create:
1. A step-by-step process document with clear ownership at each step
2. Decision points (if X, then do Y; if Z, then do W)
3. A simple flowchart in text/ASCII format
4. Time estimates for each step
5. The "tribal knowledge" questions I should ask the team to fill gaps
6. A checklist version someone new could follow on day one

최적 용도: CHATGPT

ChatGPT generates the clearest process documentation with well-structured numbered steps. Its ASCII flowcharts are more readable than other models, and it naturally includes edge cases.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Ask the person who actually does the work, not the manager who designed it. There's always a gap between the 'official' process and reality — document reality first, then optimize.

Meeting Slasher

Reduce unnecessary meetings

Here are the recurring meetings on my team's calendar:

[List each meeting: name, frequency, duration, attendees, stated purpose]

Team size: [number]
Primary communication tools: [Slack, email, etc.]

For each meeting, tell me:
1. Keep, shorten, merge, or kill — with specific reasoning
2. What async alternative could replace it (and exact format)
3. If kept: optimal duration, frequency, and attendee list
4. A meeting-free block schedule for deep work
5. Templates for async standups and status updates
6. How to handle the political fallout of canceling someone's meeting

최적 용도: CLAUDE

Claude handles the interpersonal dynamics of meeting culture honestly. It acknowledges that some meetings exist for political reasons and gives tactful scripts for proposing changes.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Calculate the total cost of each meeting: (number of attendees) x (duration) x (hourly rate). Showing a $2,000/week standup meeting in dollar terms gets leadership attention faster than any efficiency argument.

Handoff Healer

Fix broken team handoffs

Work gets stuck or lost when it moves between these stages/people:

From [person/team A] to [person/team B]:
- What's handed off: [description]
- Current method: [email, Slack, shared doc, etc.]
- What goes wrong: [common failures]

Design a handoff system that includes:
1. A standardized handoff template with required fields
2. A checklist the sender completes before passing work
3. An acceptance criteria the receiver checks
4. Notification rules (who gets pinged, when, how)
5. An escalation path when handoffs stall
6. A weekly metric to track handoff quality

최적 용도: GEMINI

Gemini excels at designing structured templates and checklists with clear formatting. Its handoff documents are immediately usable in Google Docs or Notion without reformatting.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Ask both sides of the handoff what information they need vs. what they actually receive. The gap between those two lists is exactly where your process breaks.

Tool Stack Auditor

Optimize your software tool stack

Here are all the tools/apps my team uses:

[List each tool: name, purpose, cost/month, who uses it, how often]

Pain points: [what's frustrating about current tools]
Budget: [monthly tool budget]
Team size: [number]

Give me:
1. Overlap analysis — which tools do the same thing
2. Consolidation recommendations (fewer tools, same capabilities)
3. Missing tools — gaps that are costing you time
4. A migration plan for switching tools with minimal disruption
5. Cost comparison: current stack vs. optimized stack
6. Integration opportunities between remaining tools

최적 용도: CHATGPT

ChatGPT has the broadest knowledge of SaaS pricing, features, and integration capabilities. It can compare tools at specific plan tiers, not just brand-level overviews.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Include the actual monthly cost per tool, not just 'we use Slack.' AI gives radically different recommendations when it knows you're paying $12/user vs. using the free tier.

SOP Builder

표준 운영 절차 작성하기

I need an SOP for: [process name]

Who performs this: [role/title]
Frequency: [how often]
Current documentation: [none / outdated doc / tribal knowledge]
Risk if done wrong: [consequences of errors]

Build a complete SOP that includes:
1. Purpose and scope (when to use this SOP)
2. Prerequisites and required access/tools
3. Step-by-step instructions with screenshots placeholders
4. Common mistakes and how to avoid them
5. Troubleshooting section for the top 5 failure scenarios
6. Version history table and review schedule

최적 용도: GEMINI

Gemini produces the most well-organized document structures with clear headers and formatting. Its SOPs are immediately ready to drop into Google Docs or Confluence without restructuring.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Have someone who's never done the task try to follow the SOP. Every place they get confused is a missing step. AI always skips steps that seem 'obvious' to experts.

모델 비교

실제 테스트 결과를 기반으로 합니다 — 추측이 아닙니다. 테스트 방법론 보기

G

Gemini

Best for structured documentation and templates. Produces clean, well-formatted SOPs and process docs that work immediately in Google Workspace without reformatting.

결과 출처: Gemini 2.0 Flash · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026
C

ChatGPT

Best for tool comparisons and process documentation. Knows specific SaaS features and pricing. Tends to suggest adding more tools — push it to consolidate instead.

결과 출처: GPT-4o · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026
C

Claude

Best for systems analysis and finding hidden bottlenecks. Thinks about workflows holistically and considers human dynamics, not just process steps.

결과 출처: Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026
G

Grok

Strongest at cutting through bureaucratic bloat and identifying processes that exist for no good reason. Delivers blunt, actionable recommendations for streamlining workflows. Too informal for polished corporate SOPs and formal process documentation.

결과 출처: Grok 2 · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

NailedIt에서 사용해보기

위의 프롬프트를 NailedIt에 붙여넣고 모델을 나란히 비교해 보세요.

프로 팁

1

Map the actual process, not the ideal one. Document how work really flows today — including the workarounds and shortcuts. You can't optimize a process you haven't honestly described.

2

Measure before and after, or it didn't happen. Ask AI to define 2-3 metrics before you change anything. Without a baseline, you can't prove the optimization worked and leadership won't fund the next one.

3

Optimize the constraint, ignore everything else. Improving a step that isn't the bottleneck makes zero difference to overall throughput. Find the single slowest step first and fix only that.