AI 프롬프트: 소프트웨어 개발

소프트웨어 구축은 코드를 작성하는 것만이 아닙니다 — 수개월, 수년에 걸쳐 쌓이는 결정을 내리는 것입니다. 이 프롬프트들은 더 나은 아키텍처를 설계하고, 의미 있는 테스트를 작성하며, 실제로 문제를 잡는 코드 리뷰를 수행하도록 도와줍니다. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude에서 테스트되었습니다.

마지막 테스트 날짜 Feb 15, 2026 · 모델: GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok 2
하고 싶은 것 프롬프트 최적 용도
Design system architecture for a project 아키텍처 어드바이저 Claude
Conduct thorough automated code reviews Code Review Pro Claude
Build a testing strategy for your project Test Strategist ChatGPT
Design efficient database schemas Database Designer Gemini
Set up CI/CD and deployment pipelines DevOps Pipeline ChatGPT
Identify and prioritize technical debt Tech Debt Tracker Claude

아키텍처 어드바이저

Design system architecture for a project

Help me design the architecture for a software project.

Project: [describe what you're building]
Scale: [expected users, data volume, growth rate]
Team size: [number of developers]
Tech constraints: [required technologies, cloud provider, existing systems]
Budget: [infrastructure budget range]
Timeline: [when does this need to ship]

Design:
1. High-level architecture diagram described in detail (services, databases, APIs)
2. Technology stack recommendation with reasoning for each choice
3. Data model overview with key entities and relationships
4. API design: RESTful vs. GraphQL vs. gRPC with justification
5. Scaling strategy: what changes when you go from 100 to 10,000 to 1M users
6. The top 3 architectural risks and how to mitigate them early

최적 용도: CLAUDE

Claude provides the most nuanced architecture recommendations with honest trade-off analysis. It considers team size and skill level in its technology choices rather than just recommending the 'best' tools regardless of who's building it.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Include your team's existing expertise in the prompt. A microservices architecture recommended for a team of 2 junior developers is a recipe for failure. AI should design for your team, not for a hypothetical perfect team.

Code Review Pro

Conduct thorough automated code reviews

Review this code as if you were a senior developer on my team.

[Paste the code or pull request diff]

Context: [what this code does and why it was written]
Framework: [framework and version]
Team standards: [style guide, naming conventions, patterns used]
Critical areas: [security, performance, or maintainability priorities]

Review and provide:
1. Critical issues: bugs, security vulnerabilities, or data loss risks
2. Major improvements: design patterns, abstraction opportunities, performance gains
3. Minor suggestions: naming, readability, style consistency
4. Questions I'd ask in a PR review (things that need clarification from the author)
5. Test coverage gaps: what tests are missing for this code
6. An overall assessment: ship it, needs minor fixes, or needs significant rework

최적 용도: CLAUDE

Claude conducts the most thorough code reviews with a balanced mix of critical issues and constructive suggestions. It categorizes feedback by severity and provides actionable fixes rather than just pointing out problems.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Include the PR description and context for why the change was made. AI reviews code quality much better when it understands the intent. Without context, it may suggest refactoring code that's intentionally written a certain way.

Test Strategist

Build a testing strategy for your project

Help me build a testing strategy for my project.

Project type: [web app / mobile app / API / library / CLI tool]
Stack: [languages, frameworks, testing tools already in use]
Current test coverage: [percentage or 'none']
Team testing culture: [strong / weak / nonexistent]
Most critical features: [what absolutely cannot break]
CI/CD: [what you use for continuous integration]

Design:
1. A testing pyramid specific to my stack (unit, integration, e2e ratios)
2. What to test first: prioritized list of critical paths
3. Testing patterns and conventions to adopt (arrange-act-assert, fixtures, mocks)
4. 5 example test cases for my most critical feature
5. CI pipeline integration: how to run tests automatically
6. A realistic roadmap to go from current coverage to 80%+ in 30 days

최적 용도: CHATGPT

ChatGPT generates the most practical testing strategies with framework-specific examples. Its test cases are copy-paste-ready, and it understands CI/CD platform configurations for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and others.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Start with integration tests for your critical user paths, not unit tests for utilities. Integration tests catch the bugs that actually break your product. You can backfill unit tests later.

Database Designer

Design efficient database schemas

Help me design a database schema for my application.

Application: [describe what the app does]
Data types: [list the main types of data you'll store]
Relationships: [describe how data connects: users have posts, orders have items, etc.]
Query patterns: [the most common reads and writes]
Scale: [expected data volume and growth rate]
Database: [PostgreSQL / MySQL / MongoDB / undecided]

Design:
1. Complete schema with tables, columns, types, and constraints
2. Primary and foreign key relationships with reasoning
3. Indexes for your most common query patterns
4. Normalization assessment: where to normalize vs. denormalize for performance
5. Migration strategy: how to evolve this schema as requirements change
6. Common query examples for the top 5 operations your app will perform

최적 용도: GEMINI

Gemini produces the most well-structured database schemas with thorough index recommendations. Its normalization decisions are well-reasoned, and it provides migration strategies that account for zero-downtime deployments.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

List your top 5 queries before designing the schema. Schema design should be driven by how you read data, not just how you write it. AI designs much better indexes and denormalization when it knows your access patterns.

DevOps Pipeline

Set up CI/CD and deployment pipelines

Help me set up a CI/CD pipeline for my project.

Project type: [web app / API / mobile / monorepo]
Stack: [languages, frameworks, build tools]
Source control: [GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket]
Deploy target: [AWS / GCP / Azure / Vercel / Railway / Docker]
Current deployment: [manual / some automation / none]
Team size: [number of developers]

Build:
1. A complete CI pipeline configuration file (YAML) for my platform
2. Build, test, lint, and security scan stages with specific commands
3. Branch strategy: main, develop, feature branches with merge rules
4. Deployment strategy: blue-green, rolling, or canary with justification
5. Environment management: dev, staging, production configuration
6. Rollback procedure: how to revert a bad deployment in under 5 minutes

최적 용도: CHATGPT

ChatGPT generates the most accurate CI/CD configuration files for specific platforms. Its YAML configs work with minimal modification, and it understands platform-specific nuances like GitHub Actions caching and artifact management.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Include your current deployment process, even if it's 'SSH into the server and run git pull.' AI builds better pipelines when it knows your starting point and can suggest incremental improvements rather than a complete overhaul.

Tech Debt Tracker

Identify and prioritize technical debt

Help me assess and prioritize the technical debt in my project.

Project age: [how long it's been in development]
Team size: [developers working on it]
Known pain points: [parts of the codebase everyone avoids]
Recent incidents: [bugs or outages caused by old code]
Upcoming features: [what you need to build next]
Current tech stack: [languages, frameworks, versions]

Provide:
1. A technical debt assessment framework: categories and severity levels
2. Audit checklist: questions to identify hidden debt across the codebase
3. A prioritization matrix: impact vs. effort for each debt category
4. A 'pay down' plan: how to allocate 20% of sprint capacity to debt reduction
5. Quick wins: debt that can be fixed in under a day with high impact
6. How to communicate tech debt to non-technical stakeholders (with ROI framing)

최적 용도: CLAUDE

Claude provides the most strategic tech debt assessment with honest prioritization. It doesn't just list problems but helps you decide which debt is actually worth fixing now vs. living with, based on your upcoming roadmap.

테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

프로 팁

Include your upcoming feature roadmap. Tech debt should be prioritized based on whether it blocks future work. Refactoring code you'll never touch again is satisfying but wastes time you could spend on debt that's actually slowing you down.

모델 비교

실제 테스트 결과를 기반으로 합니다 — 추측이 아닙니다. 테스트 방법론 보기

G

Gemini

Best for database design and schema optimization. Produces well-indexed, scalable schemas with clear migration strategies. Less opinionated about architectural trade-offs than Claude.

결과 출처: Gemini 2.0 Flash · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026
C

ChatGPT

Best for CI/CD pipelines and testing strategies. Generates accurate platform-specific configuration files and framework-aware test cases. Can suggest over-engineered solutions for simple projects.

결과 출처: GPT-4o · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026
C

Claude

Best for architecture decisions and code reviews. Provides the most honest trade-off analysis and considers team capability in its recommendations. Its tech debt assessments are the most strategically useful.

결과 출처: Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026
G

Grok

Offers opinionated and practical architecture advice that cuts through over-engineering. Good at identifying pragmatic solutions for real-world development, but less focused on enterprise patterns and scalability planning than Claude.

결과 출처: Grok 2 · 테스트 완료 Feb 15, 2026

NailedIt에서 사용해보기

위의 프롬프트를 NailedIt에 붙여넣고 모델을 나란히 비교해 보세요.

프로 팁

1

Design for your team, not for a blog post. The best architecture is the one your team can build and maintain. Microservices for a 2-person team or Kubernetes for 100 users is over-engineering. Tell AI your team size and skill level so it recommends appropriately.

2

Tests are an investment, not a tax. Every hour spent writing good tests saves 3-5 hours of debugging later. Start with integration tests for critical user paths rather than chasing 100% unit test coverage on utility functions.

3

Document decisions, not just code. Comments explain what code does. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) explain WHY you chose this approach. When future developers ask 'why is it built this way?' the ADR answers them without a meeting.