AI 提示詞: 教育資源

打造優秀的教育內容需要花數小時——除非您知道如何給AI正確的提示。這些提示詞幫助教師、培訓師和自學者建立真正能吸引學習者的課程計劃、工作表和教材。已在ChatGPT、Gemini和Claude上測試,讓您知道哪個模型能製作最好的資源。

最近測試日期 Feb 15, 2026 · 模型: GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok 2
您想做的事 提示詞 最適合
建立有效的課程計劃 課程計劃建立 ChatGPT
產生客製化工作表 工作表產生器 Gemini
設計全面的課程規劃 課程規劃繪製 Claude
設計評量標準 評量標準設計 Gemini
建立主題式閱讀清單 閱讀清單策展 ChatGPT
設計有效的評量測驗 評量設計 Claude

課程計劃建立

建立有效的課程計劃

Build a lesson plan for teaching [topic] to [audience: grade level / age group / skill level].

Subject: [course/field]
Duration: [class length, e.g. 50 minutes / 90 minutes]
Learning objectives: [what students should know/do by the end]
Resources available: [projector, whiteboard, computers, textbooks, etc.]
Class size: [number of students]

Create:
1. A warm-up activity (5 minutes) that activates prior knowledge
2. Direct instruction segment with key talking points
3. A guided practice activity with step-by-step instructions
4. An independent practice or group activity
5. An assessment check: how to verify learning happened
6. A closing activity and preview of next lesson

最適合: CHATGPT

Gemini能建立最結構化的課程計劃,學習目標、活動和評估方法的平衡出色。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

在課程計劃中包含「如果時間剩餘」和「如果時間不足」兩個備案B。課程不按計劃進行是正常的。

工作表產生器

產生客製化工作表

Create a worksheet for [topic] aimed at [grade level / skill level].

Learning objective: [what this worksheet should reinforce]
Format preferences: [fill-in-the-blank / matching / short answer / word problems / diagrams]
Difficulty: [introductory / reinforcement / challenge]
Time to complete: [estimated minutes]

Generate:
1. 10-15 questions in the requested format with a clear progression from easy to hard
2. An answer key with worked solutions, not just answers
3. 3 bonus challenge questions for advanced students
4. A self-assessment rubric students can use to check their own work
5. A 'common mistakes' box warning about typical errors
6. A reflection question: 'What was the hardest part and why?'

最適合: GEMINI

ChatGPT能產生最多樣和教育性的工作表,難度調整靈活。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

也一起產生用於對答案的解答卷。對自學者來說,即時的回饋不可或缺。

課程規劃繪製

設計全面的課程規劃

Help me map a curriculum for [subject] covering [time period: semester / year / course].

Standards to align with: [Common Core / state standards / AP / IB / custom]
Target audience: [grade level / age group]
Class frequency: [times per week, minutes per session]
Current resources: [textbooks, materials available]

Build:
1. A scope and sequence chart with units, topics, and approximate timing
2. Learning objectives for each unit aligned to specified standards
3. Dependencies: which topics must come before others
4. Assessment plan: formative and summative assessments for each unit
5. Differentiation notes: how to adapt for advanced and struggling learners
6. A pacing guide with buffer weeks for review and catch-up

最適合: CLAUDE

Claude提供最有邏輯的課程設計,前置知識和學習進展的考慮都很恰當。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

從課程的最後倒推設計。明確「最終應該能做到的事」後,再倒推到達那裡的步驟。

評量標準設計

設計評量標準

Create a grading rubric for [assignment type: essay / project / presentation / lab report].

Assignment description: [what students are producing]
Grade level: [audience]
Weight of assignment: [percentage of final grade]
Key skills to assess: [list 3-5 skills or criteria]

Design:
1. A 4-level rubric (Excellent / Proficient / Developing / Beginning) for each criterion
2. Specific, observable descriptors for each level (not vague words like 'good')
3. Point values for each criterion and level
4. A student-friendly version they can use as a checklist before submitting
5. Exemplar descriptions: what an 'Excellent' submission looks like
6. Common deductions: specific mistakes and how many points they cost

最適合: GEMINI

Gemini能設計具有最明確評估標準的評量標準,各等級的差異描述具體。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

在作業前與學生分享評量標準。期望值明確時,交出來的作品品質會大幅提升。

閱讀清單策展

建立主題式閱讀清單

Curate a reading and resource list for learning [topic/subject].

Audience: [students / professionals / self-learners]
Level: [introductory / intermediate / advanced]
Preferred formats: [books, articles, videos, podcasts, courses]
Time commitment: [how much time they can dedicate]
Goal: [foundational understanding / deep expertise / practical skills]

Create:
1. 5 must-read books or articles ranked from foundational to advanced
2. 3 video courses or lecture series with time estimates
3. 5 podcasts or YouTube channels for ongoing learning
4. 3 hands-on resources (workbooks, exercises, projects)
5. A suggested reading order with rationale
6. A '3-month learning path' that combines resources into a structured plan

最適合: CHATGPT

ChatGPT擁有最廣泛的書籍知識,能建立按程度和興趣個人化的閱讀清單。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

閱讀清單包含入門和進階書籍,並指定應該按什麼順序閱讀。順序對理解程度有很大影響。

評量設計

設計有效的評量測驗

Design an assessment for [topic/unit] aimed at [grade level / audience].

Learning objectives being assessed: [list 3-5 objectives]
Assessment type: [formative / summative / diagnostic]
Format constraints: [in-class / take-home / open-book / timed]
Time available: [duration]
Accessibility needs: [any accommodations required]

Build:
1. A mix of question types: 5 multiple choice, 3 short answer, 2 extended response
2. A clear scoring guide for each question
3. Questions mapped to specific learning objectives (which question tests what)
4. Distractors for multiple choice that target common misconceptions
5. A make-up version with equivalent difficulty but different questions
6. A post-assessment reflection prompt for students to identify their gaps

最適合: CLAUDE

Claude能設計最平衡的評量測驗,擅長建立測量理解而非記憶的問題。

已測試 Feb 15, 2026

進階技巧

混合多種問題形式(選擇題、申論題、應用題)。只用一種形式無法準確測量學習者的真實理解程度。

模型比較

基於實際測試結果 — 非假設推測。 查看測試方法

G

Gemini

Best for worksheets and rubric design. Produces clean, print-ready materials with well-calibrated difficulty progressions and specific observable descriptors.

結果來源: Gemini 2.0 Flash · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026
C

ChatGPT

Best for lesson plans and reading list curation. Creates engaging classroom activities and has the broadest knowledge of real educational resources across formats and platforms.

結果來源: GPT-4o · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026
C

Claude

Best for curriculum mapping and assessment design. Builds thoughtfully sequenced learning paths and creates assessments with strong objective alignment and genuine misconception-based distractors.

結果來源: Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026
G

Grok

Good at quickly surfacing free and underrated educational resources that other models overlook. Delivers honest, no-BS reviews of learning platforms without the promotional fluff. Less effective at aligning resources to specific curriculum standards and structured learning pathways.

結果來源: Grok 2 · 已測試 Feb 15, 2026

在 NailedIt 中試試

將上方的提示詞貼到 NailedIt,並排比較各模型的回應。

進階技巧

1

Design backward: start with the assessment. Decide what students should be able to DO at the end, write the test, then design lessons that prepare them for it. Most teachers plan activities first and hope learning happens. Backward design guarantees alignment.

2

One objective per lesson, no exceptions. A lesson that tries to cover three objectives covers none of them well. Students need focused practice with feedback on one skill at a time. If you have three objectives, you need three lessons.

3

Make AI materials your starting point, not your final product. AI-generated worksheets and lesson plans are 80% ready. The last 20% — adding your students' names, inside jokes, local examples — is what makes the material feel personal and engaging.